نوع مقاله : فنی ترویجی

نویسندگان

1 محقق بخش تحقیقات اقتصادی، اجتماعی و ترویج کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گیلان

2 استادیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی

3 استادیار بخش تحقیقات جنگلها، مراتع و آبخیزداری، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گیلان، سازمان تحقیقات،آموزش و ترویج

4 محقق بخش تحقیقات اقتصادی، اجتماعی و ترویج کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گیلان، سازمان تحقیقات،آموزش و ترویج

چکیده

 
موضوعات مطرح شده در زمینه ویژگی‌ها و کارکردهای مزارع خرد در سطح بین­المللی و منطقه‌ای شاهد تغییر در نحوه نگرش به کشاورزی خرد و خانوارهای دهقانی است، به دیگر سخن، مزارع خرد به جای اینکه به عنوان یکی از عوامل فقر و گرسنگی در نظر گرفته شود به راه‌حل محوری آن تبدیل شده است . با این حال، کشاورزی خرد با چالش‌های روز افزون متعددی همچون گسترش تعاملات و رقابت اقتصادی، اقتصاد بازار و کشاورزی تقاضامحور، و قیمت جهانی پایین‌تر محصولات تولید شده در مزارع بزرگ مقیاس، مواجه می­باشد و آینده آن موضوع مورد بحث مجامع علمی و سیاستگذاری در جهان است. از سویی، موافقان کشاورزی خرد بر کارکردهای آن از لحاظ امنیت غذایی، بهره­وری تولید، مقابله با فقر، تنوع بخشی به مزارع، و منافع محیط­زیستی و اجتماعی و فرهنگی تاکید می‌کنند که در این مقاله مورد بحث قرار گرفته است. رفع تحریفات سیاستی ضد کشاورزی خرد، به رسمیت شناسی اجتماعی این نوع کشاورزی، توسعه راهبرد بازار، تشویق کشاورزی پاره وقت، پرداخت به ازای دریافت خدمات اکوسیستم و ارائه خدمات عمومی محلی به کشاورزان از جمله مواردی است که در زمینه ترویج و ابقای کشاورزی خرده­پا پیشنهاد شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

An analysis of the role of small-farms in food security and its socio-cultural and environmental functions

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Askari Bozayeh 1
  • Asghar Tahmasebi 2
  • Parisa Mohammadpour 3
  • Hamid Gholami Fakhbi 4

1 Economic, Social and Extension Research Department, Gilan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center,

2 Assistant Professor of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University

3 Assistant Professor of Forestry, Rangeland and Watershed Research Department, Gilan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization(AREEO), Rasht, Iran.

4 Researcher of Economic, Social and Extension Research Department, Gilan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization(AREEO), Rasht,Iran.

چکیده [English]

The debate over small farm agriculture at both international and regional levels is witnessing a shift in attitude toward smallholder farming and peasant households; indeed, the new approach considers small farms as a major solution to poverty and hunger rather than their cause. However, small-scale agriculture is facing such escalating challenges as expanding economic interactions and competitions, market economy, demand-driven agriculture, and lower global prices of large-scale farm products so that its future has become a topic of much discussion among the global academic and policy-making circles. Advocates of small-scale agriculture, in contrast, argue for its functions in and positive impacts on food security, production efficiency, income promotion, and poverty alleviation as well as its environmental, social, and cultural benefits. The present paper will scrutinize each of these aspects. Among the measures proposed for promoting and re-establishing small-scale farming are included explication of distorted and ostensible policies raised against small-scale agriculture, social recognition of the practice, development of a market strategy for this type of farming, promotion of part-time farming, formulation of a remuneration system for ecosystem services, and provision of local public services supplied to such farmers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Small-scale agriculture
  • family farming
  • small farms
  1. شوکتی آمقانی، م.، خ. کلانتری، ع. اسدی و ح. شعبانعلی فمی.1397. مروری بر وضعیت خردی و پراکندگی اراضی کشاورزی درجهان و ایران. نشریه علمی ترویجی مدیریت اراضی، جلد 6، شماره 1.ص 83-63.
  2. عسکری بزایه، ف.، پ. شاهین رخسار احمدی، ز. مجیب حق قدم و ف. حیدرنژاد.1397. پرداخت بهای خدمات اکوسیستم، به عنوان ابزاری در جهت کاهش فقر و مدیریت منابع طبیعی. مجموعه مقالات چهارمین کنگره سالانه بین المللی توسعه کشاورزی، منابع طبیعی، محیط زیست و گردشگری ایران ص. 12-1.
  3. Abele, S., and K. Frohberg.2003. Subsistence Agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe: How to Break the Vicious Circle? Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Central and Eastern Europe, No. 22. Available at https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.93082.
  4. Altieri, M. A., and P., Koohafkan.2008. Enduring farms: Climate change, smallholders and traditional farming communities. Project Report, Series 6. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252167278_Enduring_Farms_Climate_Change_Smallholders_and_Traditional_Farming_Communities.
  5. Banerjee, A., P., Gertler and M., Ghatak.1998. Empowerment and efficiency: The economics of agrarian reform1-5. Working Paper No. 98-22. Available at https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/63573/empowermenteffic00bane.pdf;sequence=1.
  6. Barrett, C.B., 1993. On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship. Economics Staff Paper Series No. 369. Madison, WI, USA: University of Wisconsin.
  7. Birdlife International .2008. The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and the environment: a reform agenda for the New Member States. Available at http: //www. Birdlife. Org/eu/pdfs/ATF_brief_2008_CAP_in_NMS. pdf
  8. Borras, S. M., Kay, C., and A. H., Akram-Lodhi.2007.Agrarian reform and rural development: Historical overview and current issues. In Land, poverty and livelihoods in an era of globalization, ed. A. H. Akram-Lodhi, S. M. Borras Jr and C. Kay, 1-40. London and New York: Routledge.
  9. Boyce, J.K., 2004. A Future for Small Farms? Biodiversity and Sustainable Agriculture. Working Paper series Number 86.
  10. Cooper, T., K., Hart, and D., Baldock.2009. The provision of public goods through agriculture in the European Union: Report prepared for DG Agriculture and Rural Development. London: Institute for European Environmental Policy.
  11. David, C. C., and K., Otsuka.1994. Modern Rice Technology and Income Distribution in Asia. The Journal of Asian Studies. 53(3). Available at https://doi.org/10.2307/2059737.
  12. Dixon, J., K., Taniguchi, H., Wattenbach, and A. Tanyere-Arbur.2004. Smallholders, globalization and Policy Analysis. FAO, Rom.
  13. ENRD (European Network for Rural Development).2010. Semi-subsistence farming in Europe: Concepts and key issues. Available at https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/fms/pdf/FB3C4513-AED5-E24F-E70A-F7EA236BBB5A.pdf.
  14. Fanzo, J., 2018. From big to small: the significance of smallholder farms in the global food system. Available at DOI:   1016/S2542-5196(17)30011-6.
  15. FAO .2010. Policies and Institutions to Support Smallholder Agriculture. Committee on Agriculture, 22nd Session.
  16. FAO .2011a. The State of Food and Agriculture: Women in agriculture. Closing the gender gap for development. Rome.
  17. 2014. the State of Food and Agriculture 2014: Innovation in Family Farming. Rome.
  18. FAO and OECD.2014. Opportunities for Economic Growth and Job Creation in relation to Food Security and Nutrition. InterAgency Policy Report to the G20. Available at http://www.fao.org/3/bt682e/bt682e.pdf.
  19. FAO .2012. Smallholders and family Farmers. Available at http://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/273864/.
  20. FAO .2014. What do we really know about the number and distribution of farms and family farms in the world? Available at http: //www. Fao. Org/3/a-i3729e. Pdf.
  21. FAO .2010a. Policies and institutions to support smallholder agriculture. Committee on Agriculture, 22 Sessions, Rome, 16-19 June. Rome. Available at http: //www. Fao. Org/docrep/meeting/018/K7999E. Pdf).
  22. Feder, G., 1985. The relation between farm size and productivity: The role of family labor, supervision and credit constraints. Journal of Development Economics .18 (2-3): 297-313.
  23. Fredriksson, L., S., Davidovaand, M., Gorton.2010. SCARLED Deliverable 6. 3-“The importance of subsistence farming as a safety net in the NMS”, working paper, SCARLED FP6 Project. Available at http: //www. Scarled. eu
  24. Fule, C. B., 2013. Small-scale versus large-scale cocoa farming in Cameroon which farm type is more ready for the future? Master’s thesis. Available at http: //stud. Epsilon. Slu. Se.
  25. Graeub, B., E., M., Jahi Chappell, H., Wittman, S., Ledermann, R., Bezner Kerr and B., Gemmill-Herren.2015. The State of Family Farms in the World, World Development Vol. 87: 1–15. Available at http: //dx. Doi. Org/10. 1016/j. worlddev. 2015. 05. 012.
  26. Heidhues, F., and M., Bruntrup.2003. Subsistence agriculture in development: Its role in processes of structural change. In: Abele, S. and Frohberg, K. (Eds), Subsistence Agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe: How to break a vicious cycle? Halle/ Saale: Institut fur Agrarentwicklung in Mittel- und Osteuropa.
  27. Heltberg, R., 1998. Rural Market Imperfections and the Farm Size–Productivity Relationships: Evidence from Pakistan. World Development .26(10): 1807–26.
  28. HLPE .2011a. Price volatility and food security. A report by the High level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee of World Food Security. Rome.
  29. HLPE .2013. Investing in smallholder agriculture for food security. A report on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome. Available at http: //www. Deza. admin. Ch/ressources/resource_en_225682. Pdf>.
  30. IFAD and UNEP .2013. Smallholders, food security, and the environment. Available at https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/39135645/smallholders_report.pdf/133e8903-0204-4e7d-a780-bca847933f2e
  31. IFAD and UNEP .2013. Smallholders, food security and the environment. Rome. Available at http: //www. Ifad. Org/climate/resources/smallholders_report. Pdf).
  32. IFAD .2011. Proceedings. International Fund for Agricultural Development Conference on New Directions for Smallholder Agriculture, 24–25 January 2011. Rome.